Browse our most popular topicsVIEW ALL
Or Log in with our social media platforms
Having a Sorted account lets you see your personal dashboard, save your tools and track your progress. By creating an account you consent to receiving helpful emails from Sorted, although you can opt-out at any time.
Or Log in with our social media platforms
4 October 21
Reading time: 5 minutes
When you’re craving one, eating a Big Mac has short-term benefits. Really short term, like feeling full and satisfied in the moment. But what would happen if we invested that money to get some long-term gains?
The price of Macca’s most famous double burger – the one with two patties, special sauce and the extra bun slice in the middle – gets tracked a lot. While it was just US$0.75 in 1967, when it came out, these days it can be found on Uber Eats for all of NZ$8.30.
Okay, so say you took that $8.30 and invested it in shares over 45 years. And just left it there.
We forecast that your return from a managed fund invested in shares, or an aggressive KiwiSaver fund invested in shares, might be 5.5% on average (taking into account fees, taxes, inflation). After 45 years, your $8.30 would grow to $92.
That’s a big return on the price of just one Big Mac! It’s thanks to the power of compounding interest – you earn interest on your money, then that interest earns interest, which earns even more interest, and so on.
Let’s say you invested the price of a Big Mac every week instead. That’s almost $432 a year.
You’d be putting in $19,422 over 45 years, and at the same 5.5% return, you’d come out with $83,836. How about that – your money has quadrupled. That’s what investing little and often does for you.
Up to now we’ve been talking about investing over 45 years, but it’s also intriguing to look at what happens over 20 years. Not just any 20, mind you, but rather how investing over the first 20 years of your working life compares to investing over just the last 20 before age 65.
If you invested the price of Big Mac every week for the first 20 years and then left it alone until age 65, it would multiply by 7. You’d end up with a total of $65,611. You put in $9,064, and the rest would come from returns ($56,547).
But if instead you put off investing your Big Mac money until the last 20 years before age 65 – which many of us do as we enter our highest earning years – the results are less impressive.
You’d end up with just $17,205 – not even double what you put in. You’d invest that same $9,064 but earn just $8,142 in returns.
In both examples you’ve put in $9,064 of your own money, but doing that earlier in life meant a $56,547 return, compared with doing it later and getting a much smaller $8,142 return.
Point being: the earlier we start our investing – even if it’s just the price of a Big Mac – the better off we’ll be in the long term. That’s the power of compounding over time – the longer your money is invested, the better returns you should earn.
Investing is about riding the market’s waves of growth by regularly drip feeding into it (much like we do with KiwiSaver over our working lives).
We typically estimate our future results using an average, much like with the 5.5% return above. But the future will be much more varied, with many more ups and downs. In aggressive funds, for example, our results could range from as high as 22.5% to as low as ‑12.9%.
Have a look at these two lines, which are simulations for aggressive funds over 25 years. The lower orange one is if you started with $10,000 and left it invested on its own. The blue one is if you put in that $10,000 and added $50 to it every week.
In orange, if you invested $10,000 over 25 years, there’s only so much you could achieve. In this simulation with a 5.5% annual return your $10,000 would grow to $21,200. (Although you more than double your money, it’s pretty flat, right?)
In the real world, the market goes up and down so you could end up with results somewhere between $10,100 and $34,700 (the orange shaded area).
But above in blue, if you invested $10,000 and added $50 each week, that grows to $131,500. (Much better.) And your range of potential results becomes much wider and climbs much higher – somewhere between $74,200 and $170,900.
By investing regularly, you’re able to take advantage of the possibility of those larger jumps in value when they happen. As they say, you’ve got to be in it…
The other advantage of regularly drip-feeding money into your investments over the years is that you buy gradually, steadily. In many ways this is safer investing. If you dumped all your money in just before a steep fall – like one caused by the pandemic – this could be dangerous.
The big losses could be difficult to stomach, and you might give up on the whole thing before the markets recover. (Happily, they did bounce back quite quickly after COVID-19 hit. Sadly, most who had fled the market missed out.)
Investing a bit at a time sees your money growing, potentially a bit more or a bit less, but over time heading in the right direction.
As you drip feed your money in and buy investments like shares, their price could be low or high at that given time.
When shares are more expensive, for example, you end up buying fewer of them – and when they’re cheaper you buy more. Just what you want, right? Buy less when prices are high, buy more when things are on sale. Genius.
All of this is making me a bit hungry though. As I couldn’t get to a Macca’s in lockdown, it was easier to make something at home and get investing instead.
12 Christmas hacks your bank account will love
How to suss out if that website is fake
A financial mentor changed my life... so I became one
My Money Sorted: Victoria
Can I ask you a question about money, please?
Students revitalise ancestor stories by launching tour business