Did your parents tell you they had it harder in their day? You know, things like, “I had to walk to school in the snow, and it was all uphill…” Sometimes it seemed like they were saying it was uphill both ways!

Well, if you’ll permit me – and I may get slapped down for saying this – these days it feels like there is one area where they used to have it easier: not running out of money in retirement.

Once upon a time the workplace took more of a role for retirees, through generous pension schemes called a “defined benefit” – a certain amount of money paid out for life, based on your work and how long you’d been with the company. You never had to worry about running out of money.

My father runs his retirement on this setup, and although inflation means he is getting less and less in terms of buying power, at least his funds should never dry up entirely. And he and my mum have opted for an even lower rate in order to guarantee her a pension for her lifetime as well (which, since she is 13 years younger than him, is a significant amount). So she won’t run out of funds either, thankfully.

Unfortunately, there then came what may have been one of the most mistaken accounting assumptions in history: the idea that there would always be economic growth of a certain amount, say 8%, that these pension schemes could rely on to fund their payments to retirees. This turned out to be – especially in the light of our present low-interest-rate environment and advances in longevity – spectacularly wrong. But who knew?

What all this means, in short, is that those generous pension schemes are unsustainable.

Since then companies have been shedding defined benefit plans, in favour of “defined contribution” schemes like KiwiSaver, where workers save a certain amount from each pay. Back in 1990 New Zealand-registered superannuation schemes had 511,940 members; by 2014 there were 357,636. Most schemes are closed or closing and transferring to KiwiSaver.

The responsibility for funding retirement is being left more and more to individuals.

Or is it being left to the government? Many retirees rely on public money, in the form of NZ Super, for most or all of their income in retirement. It’s effectively egalitarian, and keeps many people from hardship. But it is also difficult to sustain in its current form because of the huge demographic changes that are already upon us. With those over 65 doubling in the next 25 years, the cost of NZ Super will double in 12 years and treble in 20.

Currently set at $21,380 per year for singles, most of us can’t rely on NZ Super for the same lifestyle we have when we’re working. So the savvy thing for us to do is build assets to top up.

The question remains: who should be responsible for people’s retirements?

Comments (3)

Gravatar for Ralphe.co.nz

Ralphe.co.nz

5:25pm | 25 Jul 2016

In my early 30 somethings, thankfully lucky enough to just enter the property market by relying on family to nest us rather than rent and give money to strangers (wish we'd done this sooner). Don't trust retirement schemes personally as don't like the thought of investment portfolios or the government running my savings. Would rather save myself or invest in tangible things. Just wondering what everyone else is planning and who likes/dislikes the Kiwisaver scheme? Not for me personally. I wish employers looked after their people better rather than their own profits. But business seems to be all about the bottom dollar regardless of cost to the environment or society.

Gravatar for Aj

Aj

11:08am | 20 Jul 2016

Given that a significant proportion of New Zealand society earn very little and the cost of living in Nz is very high. How could people on low incomes afford to sustain themselves? Ive been with kiwsaver for over ten years and will have peanuts to show for it when i retire and I earn pretty decent money

Gravatar for anonymous

anonymous

4:14pm | 18 Jul 2016

As a single (divorced) woman, aged 55, this is something that definitely worries me. I work full time but am renting, with no chance of now ever being able to buy my own home. I can't save enough for a deposit and I simply don't have enough working years left to service a mortgage (this is what I've been told by my bank and a mortgage broker). I belong to Kiwisaver but have only been it for around 8 years (I joined as soon as I obtained permanent employment post my divorce). I save as much as I can but the reality is that I can't save a huge amount. When I do retire I am going to be dependent on Government Super. My Kiwisaver will supplement this but there is simply no other way for me to manage once I am retired. I think it's fair enough to plan for an end date for Government Super but this date needs to be far enough down the track to ensure that people who will be affected by the change have sufficient years between the date and their retirement, to save and contribute as much as possible to their Kiwisaver.